<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 40 Years of August in Model Railroader &#8211; Part 1</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.polyweb.com/dans_rr/blog/index.php/archives/32/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.polyweb.com/dans_rr/blog/index.php/archives/32</link>
	<description>Stories about building my model railroad and other things found along the tracks</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2010 17:06:22 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Lowe</title>
		<link>http://www.polyweb.com/dans_rr/blog/index.php/archives/32/comment-page-1#comment-16438</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Lowe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 12:12:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.polyweb.com/dans_rr/blog/index.php/archives/32#comment-16438</guid>
		<description>Hi Dan,

Interesting series of posts. It was the August &#039;73 issue of MR that got me hooked on model building and model railroads as kid. Specifically, it was E.L. Moore&#039;s Bunn&#039;s Feed &amp; Seed Plant construction article. Most of that project was too difficult for me at the time, but recently I went back to the article to try and build it. When I was going through the magazine again - and other issues from that era - it seemed that many of the articles were more technical and detailed than they are today, but I wasn&#039;t sure if that was just bias on my part. As well, most of the articles seem to have more text to them than they do today. 

Anyway, I enjoy reading your posts.

Cheers,
Jim Lowe,
Ottawa, Canada.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Dan,</p>
<p>Interesting series of posts. It was the August &#8217;73 issue of MR that got me hooked on model building and model railroads as kid. Specifically, it was E.L. Moore&#8217;s Bunn&#8217;s Feed &amp; Seed Plant construction article. Most of that project was too difficult for me at the time, but recently I went back to the article to try and build it. When I was going through the magazine again &#8211; and other issues from that era &#8211; it seemed that many of the articles were more technical and detailed than they are today, but I wasn&#8217;t sure if that was just bias on my part. As well, most of the articles seem to have more text to them than they do today. </p>
<p>Anyway, I enjoy reading your posts.</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
Jim Lowe,<br />
Ottawa, Canada.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.polyweb.com/dans_rr/blog/index.php/archives/32/comment-page-1#comment-14944</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 15:40:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.polyweb.com/dans_rr/blog/index.php/archives/32#comment-14944</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s Russ Larson&#039;s legacy: he transformed MR from a hobbyist&#039;s mag to a glossy coffeetable trinket.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s Russ Larson&#8217;s legacy: he transformed MR from a hobbyist&#8217;s mag to a glossy coffeetable trinket.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Swearingen</title>
		<link>http://www.polyweb.com/dans_rr/blog/index.php/archives/32/comment-page-1#comment-5641</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Swearingen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 15:23:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.polyweb.com/dans_rr/blog/index.php/archives/32#comment-5641</guid>
		<description>Hi Dave, please see post based on these great points you&#039;ve brought up.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.polyweb.com/dans_rr/blog/index.php/archives/57&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;40 Years of August in Model Railroader - Part 9&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Dave, please see post based on these great points you&#8217;ve brought up.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.polyweb.com/dans_rr/blog/index.php/archives/57" rel="nofollow">40 Years of August in Model Railroader &#8211; Part 9</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Nelson</title>
		<link>http://www.polyweb.com/dans_rr/blog/index.php/archives/32/comment-page-1#comment-5565</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Nelson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 23:29:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.polyweb.com/dans_rr/blog/index.php/archives/32#comment-5565</guid>
		<description>Three observations

When comparing page counts how do you factor in Great Model Railroads, Model Railroad Planning, and other &quot;special&quot; issues that didn&#039;t exist at one time?  Arguably MR is now a 14 or is it 15 issue a year magazine now.   

I would also point out that using the August issue as comparison is a bit odd -- I bet that has the lowest news stand sale of any issue (since I suspect less model railroading is done that month) and thus they probably tend not to put their best articles in that issue. 

Third observation is that had I ranked issues years ago, before beginning my layout, I would have placed far less value on articles about benchwork, tracklaying, wiring, yard design etc than I would now.  Soon I will be deeply involved in structures and I imagine my ranking of articles will change once again.  Just a point
Dave Nelson</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Three observations</p>
<p>When comparing page counts how do you factor in Great Model Railroads, Model Railroad Planning, and other &#8220;special&#8221; issues that didn&#8217;t exist at one time?  Arguably MR is now a 14 or is it 15 issue a year magazine now.   </p>
<p>I would also point out that using the August issue as comparison is a bit odd &#8212; I bet that has the lowest news stand sale of any issue (since I suspect less model railroading is done that month) and thus they probably tend not to put their best articles in that issue. </p>
<p>Third observation is that had I ranked issues years ago, before beginning my layout, I would have placed far less value on articles about benchwork, tracklaying, wiring, yard design etc than I would now.  Soon I will be deeply involved in structures and I imagine my ranking of articles will change once again.  Just a point<br />
Dave Nelson</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
